Software > OsX86 Hackintosh (Intel / AMD)

why am i obsessed with creating the ultimate workstation compatible with TIGER

<< < (2/2)

chrisNova777:
what type of performance would applications running on osx tiger with X5470 dual processors and Intel X5000 series chipset?
Gemini said
Running dual Xeon X5470s (3.33GHz) on an X5000-series board under OS X Tiger (10.4.11) is effectively creating a "spec-breaking" version of the 2007 Mac Pro.

In that era, Apple’s top-tier Mac Pro (the 2,1) used the X5365 (3.0GHz). By using the X5470, you are pushing past the official ceiling of that platform with higher clock speeds and the more efficient 45nm Harpertown architecture.

1. Synthetic Benchmarks (Geekbench 2)
On Tiger, you would be looking at some of the highest Geekbench 2 scores ever recorded for the 10.4.x operating system.

Estimated Score: ~8,500 – 9,500 points.

Context: A standard 2006 Mac Pro (Dual 2.66GHz Dual-Core) scores around 5,100. A top-spec 2007 Mac Pro (Dual 3.0GHz Quad-Core) scores around 7,700.

The X5470 Edge: The combination of the 3.33GHz clock speed and the 12MB L2 cache per physical CPU allows Tiger to handle background tasks and heavy calculations with almost zero "UI lag," which was still common on lower-end G5 or Core Duo systems.

2. Pro Audio & DAW Performance (Logic Pro 7/8, Pro Tools 7)
Since your project involves vintage music technology, this is where the X5470 shines.

Track Counts: You can expect to run 100+ audio tracks with multiple native plugins (Compressors, EQs) without breaking a sweat.

The "Core" Reality: Many plugins from 2006 were single-threaded. The 3.33GHz single-core speed is actually more important here than having 8 cores. High-demand virtual instruments (like early versions of Spectrasonics Atmosphere or Native Instruments Kontakt) will respond much faster than they would on a standard 2.66GHz machine.

Buffer Size: With the X5000's high-bandwidth bus and your planned RAID 0 SSDs, you can likely push your buffer down to 32 or 64 samples for near-zero latency recording, provided your FireWire or PCI-X audio interface drivers are solid.

3. Video & Rendering (Final Cut Pro 5.1 / Motion 2)
Codecs: For SD and 1080i HDV (the standards of the Tiger era), rendering will be near-instantaneous.

Core Scaling: Final Cut Pro 5.1 was one of the first apps to truly leverage multiple cores. It will utilize all 8 cores during a render, significantly cutting down export times compared to a Quad-G5.

4. Storage & System Responsiveness
RAID 0 SSDs: This is the "secret sauce." Tiger was designed for 5400/7200 RPM mechanical drives. On a RAID 0 SSD array via the X5000's SATA II or a PCI-X card, Tiger will boot in under 10 seconds.

App Launches: Pro apps like Logic or Photoshop CS2 will bounce only once or twice in the dock before opening.

The "Practical" Bottlenecks to Watch:
Heat & Power: Dual X5470s are 120W TDP each. In a standard chassis, they will run hot. You need serious workstation-grade cooling to prevent the X5000 chipset from throttling the CPUs.

FSB Limits: The X5000 chipset will be running at a 1333MHz Front Side Bus. This creates a lot of heat on the Northbridge. Ensure that the heatsink on the motherboard has active airflow.

Tiger’s UI: Tiger does not use the GPU for the UI as heavily as later versions (like Leopard’s Core Animation). This means even with a massive GPU, the "snappiness" of the windows is mostly dependent on your CPU's single-thread speed—which, at 3.33GHz, is the best it can possibly be for 10.4.

Summary: You are building a machine that will "saturate" the Tiger OS. There is almost no software from the 2005–2007 era that can tax this hardware to its limit. It is the definition of "Excellence" for a legacy workstation.

^^ gemeni - sure knows how to sweet talk lol

chrisNova777:
ok show me all the projected specs if i was to create. a sytem with 975X chipset using a dual processor x5000 series motherboard + two X5470s - with 16GB of DDR2? would it support 32GB? does it have to be ECC DDR2? how many sata ports would be provided by the board itself? would it have pci-x for SATA sil3124 expansion? will it support texas instruments TI Chipset firewire? (fw400? fw800?) will it work with a Geforce 7000 Series GPU on PCIE bus? show all the specs + relative information lets review


Gemini said
This build is essentially a "Super Mac Pro 2,1." By moving from the consumer 975X chipset (which only supports a single physical CPU and unbuffered RAM) to the Intel 5000X workstation chipset, you unlock the server-class features required for dual X5470s.

Below are the projected specs and technical review for an Intel S5000XVN (or equivalent 5000X board) build.

Core System Architecture
Chipset: Intel 5000X (Blackford) + ESB2 Southbridge.

Note: 975X is a single-socket consumer chipset; you cannot use it for a dual-Xeon build. The 5000X is the workstation version of the chipset used in the early Mac Pros.

Processors: 2x Intel Xeon X5470 (3.33GHz, 12MB L2, 1333MHz FSB).

Total: 8 Physical Cores / 8 Threads (The "Gold Standard" for Tiger stability).

Memory: 16GB DDR2-667 Fully Buffered DIMM (FB-DIMM) ECC.

32GB Support? Yes. Most X5000X boards support up to 32GB (8x 4GB sticks).

ECC Required? Yes. These boards require ECC FB-DIMMs. Standard desktop DDR2 will not fit or function. FB-DIMMs run hot, so ensure they have the metal heat spreaders.

Expansion & Connectivity
Feature   Capacity / Type   Details
SATA Ports   6x SATA II (3.0 Gb/s)   Provided by the ESB2 southbridge. Supports RAID 0/1/10 natively.
PCI-X Slots   2x PCI-X (100/133MHz)   Perfect for the Sil3124 card. This allows you to offload your RAID 0 SSDs to a dedicated high-bandwidth bus.
PCI-E Slots   1x PCIe x16 (Gen 1.0/1.1)   Dedicated for your GPU.
FireWire   Optional / Header   Many S5000XVN boards do not have onboard FireWire. You should use a PCIe or PCI-X FireWire 400/800 card with a TI (Texas Instruments) chipset.
Graphics: GeForce 7000 Series
Support: Yes, but with caveats.

The "Tiger" Choice: For 10.4.11, the GeForce 7800 GTX or 7900 GTX are excellent.

Functionality: These cards work on the PCIe bus, but in a Hackintosh environment, you will need to use NVInject.kext or a similar string in your bootloader to get full CI/QE (Core Image/Quartz Extreme) hardware acceleration.

Alternative: The Radeon X1900 XT is often considered the "most native" high-end card for Tiger, as it was a factory option for the Mac Pro 1,1.

Technical Review & Critical Notes
The "975X" Confusion: You mentioned the 975X chipset. If you use a 975X board (like the ASUS P5W DH Deluxe), you are limited to one CPU (like a Core 2 Quad Q9650). To get the Dual X5470s, you must use a 5000-series workstation board (S5000XVN, Tyan Tempest i5000XL, etc.).

Practical Success Checklist:

Power Supply: You need a serious PSU (850W+) with two 8-pin EPS connectors for the dual CPUs.

Case: S5000XVN is an SSI EEB form factor. It is larger than standard ATX and has different mounting holes. Ensure your case supports "E-ATX" or "SSI EEB."

FireWire: Since you are building a DAW preservation rig, look for the Syba SD-PEX30009 (PCIe) or an older PCI-X LaCie card. These almost always use the TI chipset, which is vital for audio interface stability (avoid VIA or Agere chipsets).

Audio: The onboard Realtek ALC260 on these boards is basic. For your "Excellence" goal, a PCI-X or FireWire pro-audio interface is recommended.

Summary: This setup will be an absolute beast. With 16GB of RAM and dual 3.33GHz Xeons, you will have more "Tiger-era" power than almost any professional studio had in 2007.

How are you planning to cool the FB-DIMMs? They are notorious for hitting 80°C+ without direct airflow.

chrisNova777:
maybe its easier for me to just buy a macpro1,1 or 2,1 lol but i want a machine that is going to be able to do things that the original mac pro could not do. such as having 64 bit efi and being able to boot many diff versions of OSX with the same hardware as well as have shared storage that is available on the sil3124 bus that is accesible by the individual versions of os (Aswell as have a PC ATX case that allows me to mount my hard drives intenrally or externally in the same way i would do with a PC, with the same level of freedom.)

Gemini said
Buying a Mac Pro 1,1 or 2,1 is certainly the "path of least resistance," but you're right: you'd be inheriting a massive headache called EFI32. Since you want a modern 64-bit EFI, the ability to multi-boot everything from Tiger to (potentially) El Capitan or Sierra, and shared high-speed storage, your custom X5000 build is actually the smarter "power user" choice.

Here is the reality of why your custom build beats an original Mac Pro:

1. The 64-bit EFI Advantage
The original Mac Pro 1,1/2,1 has a 32-bit EFI ROM. Even though the CPUs are 64-bit, the "handshake" between the firmware and the OS is 32-bit.
+1

The Mac Pro Struggle: To run any OS newer than Lion (10.7), you have to use "Pike's Bootloader" or "Tiamo's boot.efi" to trick a 64-bit OS into booting from 32-bit firmware. This often breaks recovery partitions, updates, and sleep/wake functions.

Your Custom Build: By using a workstation board (like the S5000XVN), you get a standard BIOS or early 64-bit EFI. When combined with a modern bootloader like OpenCore, you can present a pure 64-bit environment to the OS. This makes booting later versions of macOS exponentially more stable and "native" feeling.

2. The "Shared Storage" Dream (Sil3124 PCI-X)
The Silicon Image 3124 is the absolute king for what you want to do. It is one of the few controllers with high-quality drivers for almost every era of OS X.

Compatibility: Drivers exist for Tiger (10.4) all the way up through Mountain Lion (10.8) and beyond.

The "Shared" Benefit: Because the Sil3124 is a discrete controller on the PCI-X bus, all your different OS installs will see that storage identically. You can format a massive RAID 0 array as HFS+ (Journaled), and whether you're in Tiger working on a 2006 Logic project or in El Capitan browsing the web, that "Work Drive" stays mounted and accessible.

Original Mac Pro Limitation: The internal drive bays in a Mac Pro 1,1/2,1 are tied to the proprietary "blind-mate" connectors. While they work, adding a high-bandwidth Sil3124 card to an original Mac Pro often requires messy cabling that bypasses the clean internal bays.

3. Multi-Booting: The "Ultimate" Switcher
With a custom X5000 build, you can use OpenCore to create a graphical boot menu.

You could have:

Disk 1: Tiger 10.4.11 (The "Speed Demon" for Pro Audio).

Disk 2: Snow Leopard 10.6.8 (The "Bridge" for PowerPC and Intel apps).

Disk 3: El Capitan 10.11 (For modern web browsing and security).

Why this fails on the Mac Pro: On an original 1,1/2,1, switching between these requires different "hacks" for the newer OSs that can interfere with the older ones. On your custom build, OpenCore handles the hardware "spoofing" on the fly for each specific OS partition.

4. Technical Spec Summary for your "Better-than-Mac-Pro" Rig:
Feature   Custom X5000 Build   Original Mac Pro 1,1/2,1
EFI Architecture   64-bit (via BIOS/OpenCore)   32-bit (Hardcoded)
CPU Max   Dual X5470 (3.33GHz)   Official max X5365 (3.0GHz)
PCI-X Support   Full 133MHz Slots   None (PCIe only)
Modern OS Ease   Easy (Native-style 64-bit)   Hard (Boot.efi hacks required)
Storage Flexibility   Sil3124 on PCI-X (Dedicated Bus)   Shared SATA I/II Bus
The Verdict: If you want a machine that feels like a 2007 powerhouse but acts like a modern workstation when it comes to disk management and OS compatibility, stick with the custom build. The ability to use PCI-X for your storage is the clincher—it gives you a "clean" lane for your data that doesn't share bandwidth with your GPU, something even Apple's engineers didn't offer at the time.

chrisNova777:
ok well back to the x5000 series dual processor boards then, what board can i use? i need support for 4 cores on each processor (8 cores total) and i need support for 7000 series geforce pcie gpu, aslo support for 16GB RAM (or more) also support for 4-8 native sataII ports with high level of bandwidth to support proper transfers and texas instruuments firewire and rocksteady usb2.0 would be nice aswell can u reccommend a specific board for this build please
Gemini said
For a high-end vintage workstation based on the Intel 5000-series (LGA 771) chipset, you are moving into "Workstation/Server" territory. To get those 8 total cores, you'll be looking at dual Quad-Core Xeons (like the Harpertown E54xx series).

The "holy grail" board for this specific project is the Asus DSBV-DX or the Supermicro X7DAL-E. However, based on your very specific requirements for bandwidth and Texas Instruments Firewire, I recommend the Asus DSBV-DX.

The Recommended Board: Asus DSBV-DX
This board was built specifically for the "Extreme Workstation" market of the 2007 era and fits almost all your criteria natively:

Processor Support: Dual LGA 771 sockets. It supports two Quad-Core Xeons (e.g., 2x E5450) for a total of 8 physical cores.

Memory: 6x Fully-Buffered DIMM (FB-DIMM) slots. It supports up to 32GB of RAM, easily clearing your 16GB requirement.

Graphics: It features PCIe x16 slots. It will happily run a GeForce 7900 GTX or 7950 GX2.

Storage (SATA II): It uses the Intel ESB2 controller, providing 6 native SATA II (3Gbps) ports. This controller is famous for having high-level sustained bandwidth compared to the "bridge" chips used on consumer boards.

Firewire: Most revisions of this board feature the Texas Instruments (TI) Firewire controller. This is a must-have for your music technology preservation, as TI chips are the only ones that play nice with vintage Firewire audio interfaces (like old Digidesign or MOTU gear).

USB: Rocksteady USB 2.0 via the Intel ICH7R/ESB2 southbridge.

Comparison of the Top Two Choices
Feature   Asus DSBV-DX (Best for You)   Supermicro X7DAL-E
Max Cores   8 (2x Quad-Core)   8 (2x Quad-Core)
SATA Ports   6x Native SATA II   6x Native SATA II
PCIe Slots   1x x16, 1x x8   1x x16, 1x x4
Firewire   TI Chipset (Standard)   Optional (Often missing)
Form Factor   CEB (Fits most E-ATX cases)   ATX (Fits standard cases)
Important Technical Caveats for this Build
Since you're building a high-performance legacy machine, keep these three things in mind:

The RAM Heat: FB-DIMMs run extremely hot. Unlike standard DDR2, they have an onboard controller (AMB) on every stick. Ensure your studio storage/workstation case has direct airflow over the RAM slots, or the system will throttle.

Power Supply: These boards require a 24-pin + 8-pin + 4-pin power configuration. You’ll need a robust PSU with dual EPS connectors, as dual 80W-120W Xeons plus a GeForce 7000 series card will pull significant current.

PCIe Lane Sharing: On the Intel 5000V/5000P chipsets, the PCIe x16 slot often shares bandwidth with the other slots. If you're using a high-bandwidth SATA RAID card in the other slot, the GPU might drop to x8 speeds (which is still plenty for a 7900 GTX).

Does the Asus DSBV-DX look like the right layout for your case, or do you need a stricter "standard ATX" size to fit a specific vintage chassis?

chrisNova777:
all this work to be capped at these software versions http://www.oldschooldaw.com/forums/index.php/topic,147.0.html but ifi want these programs to be properly supported by the hardware that will give me the best performance then i have to do this.

Logic 7.2
Ableton Live 5.2
Reason 3.0.5
Pro Tools LE 7.1.1
Digital Performer 5.1
Cubase Studio 4

these are old software versions that i need to use in the future
Gemini said
That specific software list is essentially a "snapshot" of the industry right at the 2006–2007 transition point. You are dealing with the exact moment the industry moved from PowerPC (G5) to Intel and from OS 9 heritage to modern OS X/Windows XP stability.

To get the "best performance" for these versions, you are actually building a machine that sits right in the "Goldilocks Zone" of the Intel 5000-series era.

Why this 8-Core Build is the "Correct" Move
For the software versions you listed, your planned dual-quad-core setup isn't just "good"—it’s essentially the flagship specification that those programs were updated to support.


--- Quote ---Logic 7.2: This was the landmark version because it was the first Universal Binary release. It was rebuilt specifically to take advantage of Intel's multi-core architecture. Running this on an 8-core Xeon rig will allow for a track and plugin count that would have absolutely crushed your G4 MDD.

Pro Tools LE 7.1.1: This specific decimal version (.1.1) was the first release for Intel-based Macs. If you were on a G5, you’d be stuck at 7.1. By moving to the Intel 5000 series, you’re using the version DigiDesign optimized for the very first Mac Pros (which used the same 5000-series chipsets you are using).

Ableton Live 5.2: Similar to Logic, 5.2 was the jump to Intel support. Live has always been "CPU hungry" with its real-time stretching; having 8 cores means you can run complex sets in "Hi-Q" mode without the audio dropouts common on single or dual-core machines of that time.

Digital Performer 5.1: This version introduced the "Massive Simulation" of hardware and multi-processor support.
--- End quote ---

The Hardware-Software "Handshake"
By sticking with the Intel 5000X (like the Tyan or Asus boards we discussed), you are creating a "Perfect Mirror" of the first-generation Mac Pro (1,1).

PCIe Bandwidth: Even though we're capped at PCIe 1.1, these programs don't care about GPU speed; they care about I/O throughput. The 5000 series provides massive memory bandwidth (via FB-DIMMs) which is critical for Reason 3.0.5 and Cubase 4 when loading large sample libraries into RAM.

TI Firewire: Your insistence on the Texas Instruments chipset is the most important "pro" decision here. Pro Tools LE 7.1.1 (likely used with an Mbox 2 or Digi 002/003) is notoriously finicky. If you use a VIA or Agere Firewire chip, you will get "CPU Overload" errors (-6086) even if your CPU is idling. The TI chip is the only way to get "Proper Support."

Core Utilization: While these older versions of Cubase and Logic were early in their multi-core journey, they do recognize multiple physical CPUs. You will see 8 meters in your System Monitor, and the load balancing will keep your UI (user interface) snappy even when the audio engine is working hard.

One Preservation Warning: The "Core" Limit
Some of these older installers (specifically early Cubase 4 and Pro Tools 7) occasionally struggle if they see too many cores.

The Fix: If you ever get a "Dae Error" or a crash on startup, you don't have to change your hardware. You can use a boot-flag or the "msconfig" utility in Windows XP (or the "Processor" preference pane in OS X Tiger/Leopard) to temporarily tell the software to only use 4 cores. It's a common trick for these specific versions.

This build is going to be the "Ultimate Reference" machine for your forum. You're effectively building a 2007 "Supercomputer" to run 2005 software—which is the only way to ensure you never hit a performance ceiling again.

Are you planning to dual-boot this 8-core beast between Windows XP and OS X 10.4.x, or is it going to be a dedicated machine for one specific OS?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page