4
« Last post by ioreg on October 08, 2024, 07:08:14 AM »
Many software boasted later versions to have optimized cpu consumption and fixing errors. But was that optimization due to degradation of quality? All versions 1.x and especially 1.0 are hard to impossible to find. The first thought is that hw corps paid to software corps to have their quality lower than hw while those software corps acquired quality soft from small firms and individuals who produced quality soft which was the case with absynth as an example. V. 1.0 of every software is the most safe way. It's also more of a routine fact that new features made later versions buggy and slower. Indeed this is a secret underlying the so called progress with each new version degraded to provide market space for new products beating the previous ones. The cunning method not obvious for non-philosophers. The question is at which version they usually introduce degradation. It can vary from product to product and there are no established methods to detect degradation. The book Audio Expert opens some secrets but in a primitive way. Having scrutinized through many versions i can only recommend sticking to v1.0 or 1.x wherever possible.