Recent | Online | Vintage | Modern | XP | Win | Mac  OS9 | DOS | Amiga | Atari ST | Graphics | Midi io | Sequencers | Roland "MC" | E-mu | Ensoniq | Akai MPCs | Samplers | Akai "S" | Roland "S"Synths | VST Samplers | VST Synths | Roland "JV" | Modules | Drums | Mixers | Timeline | HackintoshArtists | Graphics

Welcome to Oldschooldaw.com! (Online since 2014) serving vintage computers worldwide! this is our NEW WEBHOST as we've moved from our OLD GODADDY to a brand new server location to start off 2026. thanks to Godaddy for hosting the site for 11 years and a big thank you to IONOS.COM for the great pricing going forward!

Recent Posts

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 »
41
whats the max size for fat32 partition under windows 9x
Gemini said
Under Windows 9x (specifically Windows 95 OSR2, Windows 98, and Windows Me), the theoretical and practical limits for FAT32 partitions are shaped by the architectural constraints of the era.

The Standard Partition Limit
While the FAT32 file system itself can theoretically support volumes up to 2TB, Windows 9x has a practical ceiling of 127GB (or approximately 137,438,953,472 bytes).

This limitation isn't strictly a "FAT32" issue, but rather a result of the 28-bit LBA (Logical Block Addressing) used in the standard IDE/ATA drivers of the time. Once you exceed 127GB, the addressing system runs out of bits to map sectors, which can lead to catastrophic data corruption as the system "wraps around" and begins overwriting the beginning of the disk.

Key Constraints and Factors
Scandisk and Defrag: Even if you use third-party drivers to bypass the 127GB limit, the built-in Windows 9x utilities like Scandisk and Disk Defragmenter are 16-bit applications. They typically struggle or crash on partitions larger than 32GB or 64GB because they cannot handle the massive amount of cluster information in memory.

Cluster Size: FAT32 uses clusters to manage data. On a large partition, a 32KB cluster size is standard. If the partition is too large, the number of clusters becomes too high for the 16-bit FAT tables to track efficiently under 9x.

The 32GB "Format" Limit: While Windows 9x can read and write larger partitions, Windows 2000 and XP introduced an artificial 32GB limit when formatting new FAT32 partitions to encourage users to switch to NTFS. To create a 120GB FAT32 partition for a Windows 98 build, you generally need to use the 98 FDISK utility or a third-party tool.

Recommended Best Practice
For maximum stability on vintage hardware, it is generally recommended to keep partitions at or below 32GB. If you are using a larger drive (like an 80GB or 120GB HDD), splitting it into several 32GB logical drives ensures that Scandisk and other system tools remain functional and prevents the "out of memory" errors common in late-90s DOS-based environments.

You said
whats the max size of afat32 partition under windows 98SE when connected to a SIL3124 card
Gemini said
When using a Silicon Image SiI3124 controller on Windows 98SE, you are stepping outside the standard IDE/ATA limitations, but you still face the architectural ceilings of the operating system itself.

The 128GB Threshold
The primary hurdle for Windows 98SE is the 28-bit LBA (Logical Block Addressing) limit. Standard Windows 98SE drivers cannot "see" or safely address storage space beyond 128GB (137GB decimal).

While the SiI3124 chip itself is a professional-grade SATA II controller that supports 48-bit LBA (allowing for Terabytes of storage), the Windows 9x driver is the bottleneck.

With standard drivers: You should not exceed a 120GB partition. Attempting to use a larger drive or partition will result in "wrap-around" data corruption once the 128GB mark is passed.

With 48-bit LBA Patches: If you use a third-party patch (such as the well-known Rudolph Loew's patch), Windows 98SE can theoretically handle FAT32 partitions up to 2TB.

Critical Constraints for the SiI3124
Even if you patch the OS to see the full size of a modern SATA drive, there are two major "soft" limits to consider for a stable build:

1. The Scandisk/Defrag Memory Wall
The 16-bit versions of SCANDISK.EXE and DEFRAG.EXE included with 98SE will fail on very large partitions.

32GB to 64GB: Usually the "sweet spot" for stability.

127GB+: Scandisk will likely report "Out of Memory" errors because it cannot track the massive number of clusters in a FAT32 table of that size.

2. The PCI Bus Saturation
The SiI3124 is a fast SATA II controller, but when plugged into a standard 32-bit PCI slot (like those on an ASUS P5PE-VM), it is capped at a theoretical maximum of 133MB/s.

While the card supports NCQ and Hot-Plug, using a massive partition (e.g., 500GB) doesn't provide a speed advantage; it only increases the time the system spends "thinking" during boot-up or disk repair cycles.

Recommendation for Your Setup
For a high-performance Windows 98SE build using that specific card:

Primary Partition: Keep your boot partition (C:) at 32GB. This ensures all native 98SE utilities work perfectly.

Extended Partitions: If you have a larger SATA drive, use FDISK (or a tool like Partition Magic) to create additional logical drives (D:, E:, etc.) in 32GB or 64GB chunks.

Total Disk Size: If you haven't patched the system for 48-bit LBA, do not use a physical drive larger than 120GB, regardless of how many partitions you make.
42
also for those people who wnat to dual boot between osx + windows using a SIL3124 card allows you to format a partition to be 32b or 64gb or even 96gb and use that as a partition to move data between the different OS installation reboots..

so does this mean using hte sil3124 card will allow me to have a drive of data that is shared between the two operating systems? that wil be accessible by the sil3124 card regardless which os i boot into?
Gemini said
Yes, that is exactly what it means. Using the SiI3124 card in the P5PE-VM allows the controller to act as a universal storage bridge that stays active regardless of which OS you boot into.

However, since you're dealing with the massive gap between OS X Tiger (2005) and Windows 98 SE (1999), the "sharing" part depends entirely on how you format that drive.

The Strategy: The Shared "Data Partition"
To make this work seamlessly, you should create a dedicated partition (or use a secondary drive) specifically for shared files.

File System Choice: FAT32 is your only native option.

Tiger: Can read and write FAT32 perfectly (appears as "MS-DOS FAT" in Disk Utility).

Windows 98: Native home territory for FAT32.

The Constraint: You will be limited to a 4GB maximum file size. This is usually fine for audio projects or documents, but if you have massive disk images or video files, they won't fit.

Accessibility Breakdown
Feature   OS X Tiger 10.4.11   Windows 98 SE
SiI3124 Driver   Native/Sonnet Driver   Silicon Image 9x Driver
Shared Drive Visibility   Appears on Desktop as "Untitled" (or your name)   Appears in My Computer as D: or E:
Hot-Swap Support   Yes   Limited (Safe to do only if no files are open)
Large Drive Support   Up to 2TB (GPT)   Requires 48-bit LBA Patch for >137GB
Critical "Gotchas" for the Shared Drive
Avoid NTFS and HFS+: * Windows 98 cannot see your Tiger boot drive (HFS+) without expensive, obscure third-party software (like old versions of Paragon HFS for Windows).

Tiger can only read NTFS; it cannot write to it natively.

Stick to FAT32 for the shared "transfer" space.

The 137GB Barrier in Windows 98: Even if the SiI3124 chip supports large drives, Windows 98 SE natively "blindly" wraps around data after 137GB, which will corrupt your Tiger data if you aren't careful. Since you have an X6800, you likely already have a patched setup, but ensure you have an LBA48 patch installed in Win98 before pointing it at a large shared SATA drive.

The "Boot" vs "Storage" Logic: I recommend keeping your OS installations on their own separate drives/partitions and using a third partition on the SiI3124 for the "Shared Exchange." This prevents one OS from accidentally touching the system files of the other.

Suggested Partition Map
Partition 1: HFS+ (Tiger OS - Invisible to Win98)

Partition 2: FAT32 (Win98 OS - Visible to Tiger)

Partition 3: FAT32 (Shared Data - Read/Write for both)

Does your SiI3124 card have two internal ports or four? If it has four, you could even just dedicate a cheap 120GB SSD purely to the "Shared Data" role to keep things physically separate and safe.

You said
it seems fat32 would be the only format for the partition that both os could see? right?
Gemini said
That is exactly right. For a "no-hassle" bridge between OS X Tiger and Windows 98 SE, FAT32 is the only filesystem that both operating systems can read and write to natively without needing third-party drivers or unstable "hacks."

While it's the most compatible, there are a few "rules of the road" you'll need to follow to keep your data safe between the two environments.

The FAT32 Compatibility Matrix
Feature   OS X Tiger (10.4.11)   Windows 98 SE
Read Support   Native   Native
Write Support   Native   Native
Max File Size   4GB   4GB
Max Partition Size   2TB (GUID) / 32GB (MBR)*   127GB (Native Limit)**
*Tiger Note: If you format the drive in Tiger's Disk Utility, it will let you create a FAT32 partition larger than 32GB. However, Windows 98 might struggle to "see" the full size if the partition table isn't set to Master Boot Record (MBR).

**Win98 Note: Windows 98 has a built-in "Scandisk" and "FDISK" limit of 127GB. If your shared partition is larger than this, you must use the 48-bit LBA patch, or Win98 will eventually corrupt the data once you write past that 127GB mark.

How to Set Up the "Bridge" Partition
To ensure both the X6800 side (Win98) and the Tiger side see the drive perfectly, follow this setup order:

Initialize as MBR: Use Tiger’s Disk Utility to partition the drive. Go to the "Options" button under the Partition tab and ensure Master Boot Record (MBR) is selected, not GUID. Windows 98 cannot read GUID partition tables.

Format as MS-DOS (FAT): This is Tiger’s name for FAT32.

The "Naming" Rule: Keep the drive name short (8 characters or fewer) and avoid spaces or special characters (e.g., call it DATA or BRIDGE). Windows 98 can sometimes get confused by "Long File Names" in the volume label.

Are there any alternatives? (The "Why Use FAT32" logic)
Technically, other formats exist, but they are "Radioactive" for your specific builds:

NTFS: Windows 98 can't see it at all. Tiger can see it but can't write to it.

HFS+ (Mac OS Extended): Windows 98 can't see it. You could use a very old version of "MacDrive" on Win98, but it is notoriously unstable on fast Core 2 CPUs like your X6800 and often causes Blue Screens (BSODs).

ExFAT: Neither OS supports this. ExFAT wasn't introduced until late in the XP era and was never back-ported to 98 or Tiger.

One Final Pro-Tip for the SiI3124
Since the SiI3124 is a "PCI" card, Windows 98 will treat any drive attached to it as a Removable Drive by default. In your Windows 98 Device Manager, go to the properties of the disk drive under the SiI3124 and ensure "Removable" is unchecked and "DMA" is checked. This will ensure Tiger doesn't accidentally "lock" the drive in a way that prevents Win98 from mounting it properly after a reboot.
43
the Matrox Millennium G400 is a legendary card in the world of legacy hardware, and it occupies a very specific, almost "mythical" spot in Power Mac history.

The reason it’s often omitted is that, unlike the ATI or NVIDIA cards of the era, there was never an official retail "Mac Version" of the G400. However, it is famous in the hobbyist community for one specific reason: it is one of the few Matrox cards that can actually be "hacked" to work.

Here is the deal with the G400 on a Power Mac G4:

1. The "Witchy" Flash (The Hobbyist Hack)
Back in the early 2000s, a firmware hacker nicknamed "Witchy" released a custom Mac ROM for the PC version of the Matrox G400.

The Process: You had to take a standard PC G400 (Single or DualHead), put it in a PC, and use a DOS utility to "flash" the Mac BIOS onto the card.

The Result: Once flashed, the G400 would actually trigger Open Firmware and show a boot screen on a Power Mac G4.

2. Performance in Mac OS 9
When the G400 works, it is actually quite impressive for its era:

2D Quality: Matrox was famous for its incredibly sharp analog signal. If you are using a CRT or an early LCD via VGA, the G400 often looks cleaner than the stock ATI Rage 128 cards.

Environment Mapped Bump Mapping (EMBM): The G400 was one of the first cards to support this, and a few Mac games (like Expendable) actually supported it.

3. Why it isn't usually recommended anymore
Even though you can get a G400 running, it has some major drawbacks for a modern-day G4 project:

Lack of Quartz Extreme: In Mac OS X Tiger, the G400 drivers do not support hardware acceleration for the UI. This makes the OS feel sluggish compared to an ATI Radeon.

Driver Stability: The Mac drivers for the G400 were never "official" from Matrox; they were essentially beta drivers that were leaked or adapted. They are prone to crashing in certain OS 9 games.

Hardware Risk: Many PC G400s use 5V AGP signaling. If you try to force a 5V card into a later "Mirrored Drive Doors" (MDD) G4, you risk damaging the motherboard. It is safest only in the early "Sawtooth" or "Digital Audio" G4 models.

Summary
The G400 was omitted because it requires a custom firmware flash to even be recognized by a Mac. If you enjoy the "Hackintosh" style of hardware modding and want to experiment with flashing ROMs, the G400 is a fun project. But for a build where you want "set it and forget it" stability, an ATI Radeon 7000 or 9000 remains the more practical choice.

Are you looking to experiment with flashing a PC card, or are you trying to find a card that works natively out of the box?
44
Quote
ok so your saying ICH7 was the gold standard but it only ever supported SATA 150 transfer speeds?
Gemini said
This is a classic "gotcha" in the retro-computing world. You've hit on the exact reason why the ICH7 is simultaneously loved and hated.

The Short Answer:
Yes, the base ICH7 was limited to SATA 150 (1.5Gbps) in many real-world Mac implementations, but the chipset itself is a bit more complicated.

1. The Confusion: Desktop vs. Mobile
Desktop ICH7 (82801GB): Technically supports SATA II (3Gbps) speeds. However, it does not support AHCI. Because it lacks AHCI, it often defaults to IDE/Legacy mode, which can bottleneck your performance depending on the drivers you use.

Mobile ICH7-M (82801GBM): This is the "Gold Standard" I mentioned for compatibility, because it was in every 2006-era Mac (MacBook, Mac mini, iMac). But here is the catch: Apple (and Intel) limited the mobile version to SATA 150 (1.5Gbps) to save power and maintain stability with early SATA drives.

2. The AHCI Problem
This is where the "R" matters:

ICH7 (Base): No native AHCI support. You are stuck in "Legacy IDE" mode. Even if the hardware can technically push more data, the lack of AHCI means you lose NCQ (Native Command Queuing), which makes SSDs feel much slower.

ICH7R / ICH7-M / ICH7-DH: These variants do support AHCI.

3. Why it feels like the "Gold Standard" anyway
Even though the base ICH7 is often capped at 1.5Gbps, Hackintoshers call it the gold standard because it is the most compatible.

In the "Ultimate Tiger" era, stability was more important than raw speed.

A drive running at a stable 1.5Gbps (SATA I) is better than a drive on an ICH8R running at 3Gbps (SATA II) that kernel panics every 20 minutes because the AHCI drivers are flaky.

How to get SATA II (3Gbps) on your project:
Since you specifically want SATA II speeds for your boot drive on Tiger/Leopard/Snow Leopard:

Don't use the base ICH7: If your board has the base ICH7, you will likely be capped at 1.5Gbps or forced into IDE mode.

Use the ICH8R (with the 10.6 Backport): As we discussed, if you use the 10.6 drivers in 10.5.8, you "unlock" the 3Gbps speed and AHCI support that the base ICH7 lacks.

The SiI3132 is still the winner: A Silicon Image 3132 card is a SATA II (3Gbps) card. It bypasses all the Intel chipset limitations and gives you the full speed across all three OS versions natively.

Summary
If you use the onboard ICH7, you are choosing compatibility over speed (often stuck at 150MB/s).
If you use a PCIe SATA card (SiI3132) or a patched ICH8R, you are choosing speed (300MB/s), but you have to do the "kext legwork" we talked about.

Is your current "Ultimate Tiger" board using the base ICH7, or are you looking at an ICH8/G41 board specifically to get that 3Gbps jump?

You said
ICH7R / ICH7-M / ICH7-DH: ok show me some motheboards that feature these exaft chipsets that might be cheaply purchased on ebay
Gemini said
Finding a motherboard with the ICH7R or ICH7-DH (Digital Home) is the smartest move for your "Ultimate Tiger" project because these specific variants support AHCI, which the base ICH7 lacks.

Since these were premium chipsets in 2006, they are usually found on high-end LGA 775 boards. On eBay, you can often find these "orphan" boards or CPU/Motherboard combos for $30–$60.

1. The "Digital Home" Choice (ICH7-DH)
The ICH7-DH was the heart of Intel’s "Viiv" platform. These boards are fantastic for Hackintoshing because they were designed for media center PCs and almost always have AHCI enabled.

Intel D945GTP / D945GCFG1: These are classic Intel-branded desktop boards. They are extremely "plain" but very stable. The D945GCFG1 was often found in Gateway or Dell enthusiast desktops of that era.

ASUS P5W DH Deluxe: This is a legendary board in the retro community. It uses the i975X chipset paired with the ICH7-DH. It’s highly sought after because it has built-in Wi-Fi and excellent overclocking for Core 2 Duos.

Gigabyte GA-8I945P-G-RH: A solid mid-range board that features the ICH7-DH. Gigabyte boards from this era are famous for having very "Hackintosh-friendly" BIOS options.

2. The "Enthusiast" Choice (ICH7R)
The ICH7R was the workstation/RAID version. These boards often feature more SATA ports (usually 4–6) and better power delivery for quad-core CPUs.

ASUS P5B Series: While the standard P5B uses the ICH8, the ASUS P5B Deluxe and P5B-E often use the ICH8R or high-end ICH7R variants.

Abit AW9D-MAX: If you find this at a flea market or a cheap "Buy It Now" on eBay, grab it. It’s one of the most beautiful boards ever made (blue LEDs, heat pipes) and uses the i975X + ICH7R combo.

Intel D975XBX / D975XBX2 ("Bad Axe"): These were Intel's flagship workstation boards. They are rock-solid and feature the ICH7R. They were the "workhorse" boards used by many early developers in the Hackintosh scene.

3. The "Workstation" Choice (ICH7-M)
Technically a laptop chip, the ICH7-M (Mobile) actually appeared on some rare "MoDT" (Mobile on Desktop) motherboards. These are rare but "magical" because they are 100% native to the Mac drivers.

AOpen i975Xa-YDG: A very rare board that allowed you to put a laptop Core Duo / Core 2 Duo into a desktop. It uses the ICH7-M and is essentially a Mac mini in a desktop form factor.

Summary Shopping List for eBay:
Search for these models or keywords to find the best deals:

"Intel D975XBX" (Great for ICH7R stability)

"ASUS P5W DH" (The best for ICH7-DH features)

"LGA 775 i945P" (Broad search—look at the photos for "ICH7R" printed on the chip or board)

"Dell Dimension 9100 / 9150 Motherboard" (Often uses the ICH7R and can be found for under $25 as a replacement part).

One Critical Warning: If you buy a Dell or HP "OEM" board from eBay, make sure it comes with the proprietary front panel adapter or that you are comfortable re-wiring the power button pins, as they don't use standard headers!
45
so whats the fix to enable ich8r support in 10.5.8 leopard?
Gemini said
To enable full AHCI support for the ICH8R chipset in Mac OS X 10.5.8, you have to bridge the gap between the hardware's Device ID and the OS's driver list. Since the ICH8R (ID 0x2822) isn't natively "whitelisted," the OS won't load the AHCI stack for it without a nudge.

Here are the three most effective ways to do it, ranging from the "quick fix" to the "pro setup."

1. The "Injector" Kext (The Standard Community Fix)
This is the most common method. Instead of editing the original Apple drivers (which is messy and breaks during updates), you use a "dummy" kext that tells the system to use the existing AHCI driver for your specific hardware.

The File: Usually called AHCIPortInjector.kext or LegacyAppleAHCIPort.kext.

The Logic: Inside the kext's Info.plist, you add a entry for your ICH8R ID (0x2822).

Installation: You place this kext in /System/Library/Extensions (and repair permissions) or, more ideally, in the /Extra/Extensions folder of your bootloader (Chameleon/Clover).

Result: Upon boot, the OS sees the injector, recognizes your SATA controller, and loads the native AppleAHCIPort.kext.

2. The DSDT "Spoof" (The Cleanest/Pro Method)
If you are comfortable with DSDT editing (the BIOS hardware map), this is the "Golden Standard." It tricks the OS into thinking your ICH8R is actually a chip that Apple did support, like the ICH8-M (Mobile) found in early Intel MacBooks.

The Fix: You find the SATA device in your DSDT (usually named SATA or IDE0) and inject a device-id.

The Code: You "alias" your ID to 0x2829 (the ICH8-M ID).

Why it's better: This requires zero modified kexts in the OS. You can reinstall Leopard from a retail DVD and it will work "natively" because the fix is happening at the hardware-description level.

3. The 10.6 Backport (The "Magical" Driver Swap)
As we touched on earlier, Snow Leopard (10.6) had a much more advanced and "forgiving" AHCI driver than Leopard.

The Move: Take the AppleAHCIPort.kext and IOATAFamily.kext from a 10.6.8 installation.

The Installation: Replace the versions in your 10.5.8 /System/Library/Extensions folder with these.

The Benefit: The 10.6 versions already have a wider net for Intel ICH8/9/10 IDs. Often, this "just works" without needing any extra injectors or DSDT edits.

The "Orange Icon" Fix (Crucial Step)
Even after the ICH8R is recognized, Leopard often treats internal drives as removable (showing orange icons). This is because the ICH8R reports "Hot-Plug" capability.

To fix this, most enthusiasts use a Hex Patch via their bootloader.

The Patch: It searches the AppleAHCIPort binary for the "external" flag and forces it to "internal."

Find: 45 85 f6 74 0e 48 8d 3d

Replace: 45 85 f6 eb 0e 48 8d 3d
(Note: Specific hex strings vary by OS version, but this was the standard "Orange Icon" fix for the 10.5/10.6 era.)

Which should you choose for the "Ultimate Tiger" machine?
If you are planning to dual-boot 10.4.11 and 10.5.8:

For 10.5.8: Use the 10.6 Backport. It’s incredibly stable and handles the ICH8R's quirks better than the native 10.5.8 driver.

For 10.4.11: AHCI is much more "hit or miss." Many people stick to IDE mode in the BIOS for Tiger, or use the Silicon Image 3132 card you mentioned, as it has a dedicated driver that works perfectly across both OS versions.
46
ive done alot of these lists before but here we go again;)
this ones the list im working off the last few days to try to research some topics


Quote
Geforce GT 520      325 (April 13 2011) (10.7+)
�
Geforce GTX 480        4078 (March 26, 2010) (10.6.7+)

GTX 470         3162 (March 26 2010) (10.6.5+)
�
GTX 570          2623 (2010) 
Quadro 4000 pcie2      1471 (Nov 16 2010) (10.6.5+)
�
Radeon HD4870      1386 (June 26, 2008) (10.5.7+)
�
Radeon HD5770      1349 (October 13, 2009) (10.6.4+)
�
Geforce GTX 260   1202 (June 26, 2008) (10.5.8+)
�
Geforce GTS 240   835 (July 1, 2009) (10.5.6+): do not confuse with GT 240, diff arch
�
Geforce GTS 250   563 (March 3, 2009) (8800GT’s offspring, G92)
�
Radeon HD6570      554 (April 19, 2011) (10.6.8+)
�
Geforce GT 240      476 (November 17, 2009). (10.6.3+)
�
Geforce 8800 GT   455 (Oct 29 2007) (10.5.2+)  � only supported via Nvidia WebDrivers�
GT 620         393 (May 15 2012) (10.7.5+) or (10.8.2+) lion + ml + up

�
Geforce 7950 GT   345 (August 6, 2006) (10.4.8+)
�
Radeon HD 2600 XT   283 (June 28, 2007) (10.5.2+) Mac Pro early 2008
�
Geforce 7900 GS    262 (September 6, 2006) (10.4.7+)
�
Geforce 7800 GT   244 (August 11 2005) (10.4.3+)
https://lowendmac.com/2024/mac-gpu-upgrades-nvidia-geforce-7800-gt/

Quadro FX 5500      242 (April 20, 2006) (10.4.7+)
�
Geforce 7600 GT   234 (March 9 2006) (10.4.8+) 
�
Geforce GT 220      223 (October 12, 2009) (10.6.3+)
�
Radeon HD 2600 Pro   211 (June 28, 2007) (Early 2008 iMac) (10.5.2+)
�
Geforce 7800 GS   177 (February 2, 2006) (10.4.9+)
�
Geforce 7600 GS   166 (March 22, 2006) (10.4.9+)?
Radeon X1900 GT   145 (May 1, 2006) (10.4.7+)
Geforce 6600 GT   143 (August 12, 2004) (10.4.3+) no 10.6 support?
�
Geforce 6800 GT   142 (April 14, 2004) (10.5.2+)
�
Geforce 8600 GT    141 (April 17, 2007) (10.5.2+)
�
Geforce 6800 Ultra   139 (April 14, 2004) (10.3.5+)
�
Geforce 7300 GT   124 (May 15, 2006, First Mac Pros 2006)
�
Radeon HD 2400 XT   119 (June 28 2007) (10.5.2+)

�
Radeon X1950 Pro   113 (October 17, 2006)
�
Radeon X600 XT   92 (Sept 2004)
�
Radeon X1650 Pro   85 (August 23, 2006)
�
Radeon X1300 Pro   84 (October 5, 2005)
�
Radeon X800 GT   84 (November 1, 2005)
�
Radeon X850 XT    82 (February 28, 2005)
�
Radeon 9800 Pro   59 (March 1, 2003)
�
Radeon X1300      58 (October 5, 2005)
Geforce 6200      37 (October 11, 2004)
GeForce FX 5200 Ultra      12   
Geforce FX 5200   8

47
the best choice is the choice thats affordable + works well. and has all the connections you need, doesnt overheat, doesnt cause problems, buy it + forget it.

for the goal of compatibility with the earliest tiger OSX.. the 2 undisputed champtions of all factors, price being one of them, power being one of them, im going to have to say its between the 6600GT and the 7600GT because my goal is not games its audio creation and graphics creation. being able to play games for nostalgia is just a bonus cherry on top not the main goal for me. so with that in mind why chase the most expensive baddest card? no thanks ill keep my money in my wallet and ill buy a 2nd hand card that does the job for the least expense.. for me, that card is the GEforce 7600 GT 256MB card. (pny + evga have been noted because they use the proper device id etc but there are lots of other cards from other brand names that will work aswell.

if only the GT220 and GT240 would have added support for tiger + leopard! but they didnt. so here we arel, buying 7600 GT to make it work.
48
well i've ordered a few of these sil3132 cards that have 2 external + 2 internal ports but u use the jumpers to switch between internet or external wiring which gives flexibility on where your drive is going to be stored... lookin forward to testing it with my early hackintosh machines with ICH7 + ICH5
49
Conclusion:
If you want to stay "Vanilla" and use only onboard ports,
yes, 975X + ICH7R is effectively your only choice for a fully functional "SATA II" capable Tiger experience.

If you are willing to use a PCIe expansion card, you can use *any board* that has a free pcie slot, and supports slot 771/775 cpu, such as a E8600.

Several ASUS motherboards, primarily from the LGA775 era (mid-2000s), feature the Intel ICH7R southbridge, which is known for supporting SATA RAID (0, 1, 10, 5) and Matrix Storage Technology.

Key ASUS motherboards with the ICH7R chipset include:

ASUS P5W64-WS Professional
ASUS P5WD2-E Premium
ASUS P5WD2 Premium
ASUS P5LD2
ASUS P5LD2 Deluxe
ASUS P5LD2-E

ASUS P5BV (Server Board)
ASUS P5BV/SAS (Server Board)
ASUS P5M2-E/4L (Server Board)
ASUS P5M2/SAS (Server Board)


These boards were generally paired with Intel 955X, 975X, or 945P northbridge chipsets to provide the ICH7R functionality.
50
so the only way for me to get NCQ + hot plug capability in OSX TIGER on a intel hackintosh, with 7600GT gpu, and e8600 cpu, would be to use a motherboard that has 975X + ICH7R? is that correct? anything higher or lower will not work is that correct?
Gemini said
Strictly speaking, for onboard Intel SATA on Tiger (10.4.x), your assessment is almost entirely correct. Tiger was the first Intel-capable Mac OS, and its AHCI (Advanced Host Controller Interface) drivers were incredibly primitive and specific to the hardware Apple was shipping at the time (primarily the first Mac Pro and iMacs using the 945/975X chipsets).

Here is the breakdown of why the 975X + ICH7R is your "Goldilocks" zone, and why deviating from it usually leads to a dead end:

1. The ICH7R Requirement
Tiger's AppleAHCIPort.kext was written for the specific Device IDs of the ICH7 series.

Lower (ICH6 or below): Most of these do not support AHCI at all or lack the specific registers Tiger expects for NCQ (Native Command Queuing).

Higher (ICH8, ICH9, ICH10): While these do support AHCI, Tiger lacks the built-in Device IDs for them. While you can "spoof" them by injecting IDs into the kext, you often run into a specific Tiger-era bug where only two SATA ports are recognized, or the system fails to initialize NCQ because the register offsets shifted slightly between ICH7 and ICH8.

2. Why NCQ + Hot Plug is so picky
In Tiger, if you aren't using a "recognized" AHCI controller, the OS defaults to using AppleIntelPIIXATA.kext.

PIIXATA treats SATA drives as if they are old-school IDE/PATA drives.

The Result: You lose NCQ, you lose Hot Plug, and you are capped at "Legacy IDE" speeds (effectively SATA I or worse).

3. The "Higher" Chipset Trap
If you use a P35/P45 board (ICH9/ICH10) with your E8600, you will likely get Tiger to boot, but you will almost certainly be stuck in IDE emulation mode. You might see the drives, but they will show up as "Internal" (not hot-swappable) and won't support the queueing depth required for NCQ.

Is there any other way?
If you don't want to hunt down a rare 975X board (like the ASUS P5W DH Deluxe), there is one "cheat code" that actually works better for NCQ and Hot Plug on Tiger:

The Silicon Image 3132 PCIe Card.
As you've noted in your recent research, Tiger has excellent third-party support for the SiI3132 or SiI3124 chipsets.

The Benefit: If you put a $15 SiI3132 card into any Core 2 Duo motherboard, the FirmTek or Silicon Image drivers will give you full SATA II speeds, true Hot Plug (the drive will appear/disappear on the desktop like a USB drive), and NCQ.

The Catch: You usually can't boot the Tiger installer from these cards easily; you often need to install to a drive on the onboard SATA first, install the drivers, and then move the drive to the card.

Summary Checklist for your Build:
Feature   Onboard (ICH7R)   Onboard (ICH8/9/10)   PCIe Card (SiI3132)
Tiger Compatibility   Native (Best)   Patchy/Difficult   Driver Dependent
NCQ Support   Yes   Rarely (in Tiger)   Yes
Hot Plug   Yes   Often No   Yes
SATA Speed   3.0 Gbps   3.0 Gbps   3.0 Gbps

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 »