Recent | Online | Vintage | Modern | XP | Win | Mac  OS9 | DOS | Amiga | Atari ST | Graphics | Midi io | Sequencers | Roland "MC" | E-mu | Ensoniq | Akai MPCs | Samplers | Akai "S" | Roland "S"Synths | VST Samplers | VST Synths | Roland "JV" | Modules | Drums | Mixers | Timeline | HackintoshArtists | Graphics

Welcome to Oldschooldaw.com! (Online since 2014) serving vintage computers worldwide! this is our NEW WEBHOST as we've moved from our OLD GODADDY to a brand new server location to start off 2026. thanks to Godaddy for hosting the site for 11 years and a big thank you to IONOS.COM for the great pricing going forward!

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
so my P5B Deluxe Wifi/AP will never be enough for Snow Leopard true potential without pcie 2.0 support??

That is a bittersweet realization for many LGA775 enthusiasts. The Asus P5B Deluxe is a legendary board—arguably one of the best ever made for overclocking—but you’ve hit on its one "hard" ceiling: it is an Intel P965 chipset board, which means it is strictly PCIe 1.1.

Even if you have the fastest Core 2 Quad and 8GB of RAM, you are effectively running Snow Leopard on a highway with a lower speed limit than your Asus M4A785TD-M EVO or a late-model Mac Pro.

Why the P5B Deluxe Hits a Wall in Snow Leopard
The "True Potential" of Snow Leopard relies on high-speed data movement, and the P5B Deluxe has three specific bottlenecks compared to a PCIe 2.0 board:

1. The GPU "Choke" Point
Snow Leopard introduced Core Animation and OpenCL everywhere. These technologies constantly move textures and data between the System RAM and the GPU.

PCIe 1.1: Has a bandwidth of 250 MB/s per lane.

PCIe 2.0: Doubles that to 500 MB/s per lane.
If you’re using a high-end card like an NVIDIA GT 120 or an ATI 4870 (popular Snow Leopard cards), the P5B Deluxe forces that card to work with half the available "breathing room" for the bus. You might notice slight micro-stutters in the UI that wouldn't exist on a 2.0 board.

2. The SSD "Glass Ceiling"
As we discussed with your other boards, a modern SATA III SSD on a PCIe expansion card is a night-and-day difference for Snow Leopard's boot times and app launches.

On the P5B Deluxe, a PCIe x1 SATA card will max out at ~200-220 MB/s because of PCIe 1.1 overhead.

On a PCIe 2.0 board, that same card hits ~400-500 MB/s.
Snow Leopard loves fast "random access" speeds, and the P5B Deluxe simply can't let a modern drive stretch its legs.

3. The Southbridge (ICH8R)
While the P5B Deluxe was great because it supported AHCI (unlike the G41 board), its internal communication between the CPU and the various ports (USB, SATA, Ethernet) is handled via the DMI (Direct Media Interface), which on the P965 chipset is equivalent to PCIe 1.1 speeds. When you’re pushing the system hard—say, recording audio while moving files—the bus gets crowded much faster than on 2.0-era chipsets.

The Silver Lining: Why the P5B Deluxe is still "Great"
Even if it isn't "True Potential" in terms of raw bandwidth, the P5B Deluxe has one thing the G41 doesn't: Stability and Compatibility.

Native AHCI: Unlike your G41MT-S2PT, the P5B Deluxe has a proper Intel ICH8R controller. Snow Leopard "sees" this natively, making it one of the most stable Hackintosh builds ever.

Overclocking: You can often push an E8600 or a Q9650 much higher on a P5B Deluxe than on almost any other board, which can sometimes compensate for the slower PCIe bus in CPU-heavy tasks.

Comparison: Performance Ceiling
Feature   P5B Deluxe (P965)   Asus M4A785TD (785G)
Max Disk Speed (PCIe)   ~220 MB/s   ~500 MB/s
GPU Bus Width   PCIe 1.1 (Slower)   PCIe 2.0 (Faster)
OpenCL Performance   Limited by Bus   Optimal
"Feel" in Snow Leopard   Smooth   Snapdragon-fast
The Verdict: You’re right. The P5B Deluxe is a "Formula 1 car from 2006." It’s amazing, but Snow Leopard is a "2009 track." To see what the OS is truly capable of when it's fully "unleashed," you need that PCIe 2.0 bandwidth.
2
OsX86 Hackintosh (Intel / AMD) / Leopard was the first OSX to support PCIE 2.0
« Last post by chrisNova777 on April 16, 2026, 12:04:03 AM »
does leopard know what pcie 2.0 is?
Yes, Leopard (10.5) definitely "knows" what PCIe 2.0 is, unlike Tiger.

While Tiger was a transition OS that just happened to run on early PCIe hardware, Leopard was the first version of Mac OS X to ship on machines that officially supported and advertised the PCIe 2.0 standard.

1. The Arrival of "Native" Support
PCIe 2.0 support was introduced to the Mac lineup with the Early 2008 Mac Pro (3,1). This machine shipped with Mac OS X 10.5.1. Because this hardware featured two PCIe 2.0 x16 slots, Apple had to update the kernel and the IOPCIFamily.kext (the driver that manages the PCI bus) to handle the increased link speeds and power requirements.

2. Visible Differences in Leopard
If you are running Leopard on your Asus M4A785TD-M EVO (which is a PCIe 2.0 board), you will see better integration than in Tiger:

System Profiler Recognition: In Leopard, if you go to About This Mac > More Info > PCI Cards, the OS is much better at identifying the link speed (5.0 GT/s) and the current lane width (x1, x4, x16) of your devices.

Driver Availability: Leopard was the era where "modern" PCIe 2.0 GPUs arrived. Cards like the NVIDIA 8800 GT and ATI Radeon HD 4870 required Leopard (specifically 10.5.2 or later) because their drivers were built around the PCIe 2.0 architecture.

3. Practical Impact for Your Builds
Feature   OS X Tiger (10.4)   OS X Leopard (10.5)
PCIe 2.0 Status   Accidental. Works via hardware backward compatibility.   Intentional. Kernels and drivers updated for the standard.
GPU Selection   Very limited (mostly PCIe 1.1 era cards).   Much broader (supports Early 2008/2009 era 2.0 cards).
Stability   Occasional bus errors on newer boards.   High stability on PCIe 2.0 chipsets.
Disk Performance   Same as Leopard (Hardware-bound).   Same as Tiger (Hardware-bound).
The "Compatibility Trick"
Because you’re switching between boards like the Gigabyte G41 (PCIe 1.1) and the Asus M4A785 (PCIe 2.0):

Leopard is the "Bridge" OS: If you want a dual-boot system, Leopard is much more comfortable on that Asus board. It won't get "confused" by the newer chipset features as easily as Tiger might.

Expansion Cards: If you use a PCIe 2.0 SATA III card, Leopard’s updated PCI family drivers ensure the card is initialized correctly at its full 5.0 GT/s speed without needing third-party patches to the "IOPCI" system files.

The Verdict: If your goal is the absolute "Ultimate" performance for a mid-2000s workstation, Leopard is the first OS that is truly "aware" of the hardware speeds your Asus board can provide.
3
does osx tiger support PCIE 2.0?
Technically, Mac OS X Tiger does not have native support for PCIe 2.0, because the hardware it was designed for simply didn't use it yet.

However, in the world of vintage workstations and Hackintoshes, the answer is a bit more nuanced.

1. The Official History
When Tiger (10.4) was released and during its primary update cycle (up to 10.4.11), Apple’s professional hardware was transitioning from PCI-X to PCIe 1.1:

Late 2005 Power Mac G5: These were the first Macs with PCIe, and they used PCIe 1.1.

2006/2007 Mac Pro (1,1 and 2,1): These also used PCIe 1.1.

PCIe 2.0 didn't arrive in the Mac world until the Early 2008 Mac Pro (3,1), which shipped with Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard.

2. Does it work in your G41 / AMD builds?
Yes, it will "work," but not because Tiger knows what PCIe 2.0 is. It works because of hardware backward compatibility:

The "Invisible" Speed: If you put a PCIe 2.0 card into your Asus M4A785TD (which is a PCIe 2.0 board), the hardware negotiates that 2.0 speed at a level below the operating system. Tiger just sees a generic "PCI Device."

No Software Benefit: Tiger doesn't have the updated drivers or kernel optimizations to specifically take advantage of PCIe 2.0 features (like advanced power management or certain high-end graphics calls). It treats the bus as a very fast pipe, but it doesn't "know" it's 2.0.

3. Potential Issues
If you are pushing Tiger onto a PCIe 2.0 system, keep these two things in mind:

GPU Drivers: This is the biggest hurdle. Most PCIe 2.0 graphics cards (like the NVIDIA 8000/9000 series or ATI HD 4000 series) do not have drivers for Tiger. You are usually stuck using PCIe 1.0/1.1 era cards (like the NVIDIA 7000 series or ATI X1900) even if the slot is 2.0.

Bus Errors: Occasionally, very early versions of Tiger (like 10.4.4 or 10.4.7) can get "confused" by modern PCIe bridges on newer motherboards, leading to kernel panics during boot. Stick to 10.4.11 for the best chance of stability on that Asus board.

The Verdict: Tiger will run on a PCIe 2.0 motherboard and will benefit from the extra bandwidth for things like disk controllers, but it won't officially "recognize" the standard. It's essentially "over-provisioning" the OS with more speed than it was ever programmed to expect.
5
 Thunderbolt 5 compatibility is what i should be looking into? instead of what the end of the mac pro means for musicians:?
Yes, Thunderbolt 5 is the specific technological pivot you should be watching, because it is the "bridge" that makes the end of the Mac Pro tower manageable for a high-end studio.

Think of it this way: The Mac Pro was a container for your gear. Thunderbolt 5 is the pipeline that lets that same gear live outside the computer without losing performance.

Why Thunderbolt 5 is the "Successor" to the PCIe Slot
For musicians, the "End of the Mac Pro" is really just the "End of Internal Slots." Thunderbolt 5 solves this by doubling the data highway:

Twice the Speed: While Thunderbolt 3 and 4 were capped at 40Gb/s, Thunderbolt 5 hits 80Gb/s (and up to 120Gb/s in certain modes).

True PCIe Parity: Thunderbolt 5 provides a massive jump in PCIe throughput (64Gbps). This is the "magic number" for musicians using high-track-count audio interfaces or PCIe cards (like Avid HDX or UAD-2). It finally offers enough bandwidth to run multiple cards in an external chassis without the "bottlenecking" that sometimes occurred on older TB3/4 setups.
+1

Backwards Compatibility: Importantly, your existing Thunderbolt 3 and 4 gear (like your current interfaces) will still work. You won't need to throw away your current equipment; you just gain a much wider "pipe" for future expansions.

What to Look For (Strategic Moves)
Instead of mourning the tower, focus your hardware strategy on these three areas:

1. Thunderbolt 5 Expansion Chassis
Companies like Sonnet and OWC have already begun releasing Thunderbolt 5 PCIe expansion boxes (like the Sonnet Echo SE I T5). If you have a favorite PCIe card from your old Mac Pro, you can simply move it into one of these.

Pro Tip: Look for "Dual-Bus" chassis. These use two Thunderbolt cables to give each PCIe slot its own dedicated 80Gb/s lane—effectively recreating the internal bandwidth of a Mac Pro.

2. The "Externalized" Rack
Since you are already planning a studio layout with IKEA Billy/Gnedby units, you can pivot from "one big computer" to a "Brain + Rack" setup:

The Brain: A Mac Studio (likely the M4 or M5 Ultra models released recently) tucked away.

The Rack: A dedicated 2U or 3U rack enclosure that houses the Mac Studio and your PCIe cards together.

3. NVMe Storage Arrays
With the Mac Pro gone, you lose internal drive bays. Thunderbolt 5 allows for external NVMe RAIDs that are just as fast as internal storage. This is where you should put your sample libraries (Kontakt, Spitfire, etc.) to keep your project load times near-instant.

Comparison: Tower vs. Thunderbolt 5 Setup
Feature   Legacy Mac Pro (Internal)   New Mac Studio + TB5 (External)
Upgradeability   Open the side panel   Swap the external box/drive
Noise   Internal fans near your ears   Chassis can be placed in a silent rack
Cable Management   Clean (all internal)   "Octopus" (requires high-quality TB5 cables)
Portability   Nearly impossible   Easy to take the "Brain" to another studio
Bottom Line: The end of the Mac Pro isn't a loss of power—it's a change in geometry. By focusing on Thunderbolt 5, you're ensuring that your studio remains modular and that your specialized equipment can outlive the computer it's currently plugged into.
6
Apple has officially discontinued the mac PRO what does this mean to musicians with lots of equipment that they maintain?
The official discontinuation of the Mac Pro in March 2026 marks the end of an era for musicians who rely on internal PCIe expandability. While Apple Silicon has made the Mac Pro's raw processing power less of a "lone peak" than it once was, the loss of the tower form factor presents specific logistical challenges for studios with deep hardware integration.

Here is what this shift means for musicians and studio owners:

1. The Death of Internal PCIe
The most significant impact is the loss of internal PCIe slots. For years, pro studios have used these for:

DSP Cards: Avid HDX cards for Pro Tools or Universal Audio UAD-2 Octo cards.

High-Bandwidth Storage: Multi-drive NVMe RAID cards for massive sample libraries.

Specialized Networking: 10GbE or fiber connectivity for server-based templates.

The Reality: You will now have to move these to Thunderbolt Expansion Chassis (like those from Sonnet or OWC). While Thunderbolt 5 (now appearing in 2026 Macs) offers up to 120Gb/s, it still introduces an extra piece of hardware, more cables, and potential fan noise into your rack.

2. The Mac Studio as the "New Standard"
Apple has positioned the Mac Studio as the direct successor. With the M5 Ultra refresh expected later this year, the performance gap between the discontinued Mac Pro and the Studio has vanished.

Small Footprint: It fits easily on a desk or a rack shelf, but lacks any user-upgradable internals.

Unified Memory: Since RAM is integrated into the chip, you must decide your maximum memory needs (e.g., 128GB or 192GB) at the time of purchase. You can no longer "add more sticks" later.

3. Maintenance and "Legacy" Longevity
For those maintaining older towers (like the 2010–2012 "cheesegraters" or the 2019 Intel models):

Parts Scarcity: While third-party components (GPUs, RAM) for Intel Mac Pros will remain available on the secondary market, official Apple support and proprietary parts (like power supplies or logic boards) will eventually become harder to source.

Software Ceiling: macOS support for Intel-based Mac Pros is winding down. Musicians using specialized PCIe hardware may find themselves "frozen" on older OS versions to maintain compatibility, much like the transition from PowerPC to Intel years ago.

4. The Move to External Everything
The "all-in-one" workstation is being replaced by a "modular-external" workflow:

Storage: High-speed external NVMe enclosures are now the standard for sample libraries.

Connectivity: Thunderbolt docks are becoming mandatory to handle the sheer volume of USB-MIDI controllers, dongles, and audio interfaces.

Summary of Alternatives
Feature   Mac Studio (Current Path)   Used 2019 Mac Pro   Windows Workstation
Expansion   External Thunderbolt only   8x PCIe Slots (Internal)   Highly Modular/Internal
CPU Power   M3/M5 Ultra (Top-tier)   Intel Xeon (Aging)   Latest Intel/AMD (Top-tier)
Longevity   High (Current Architecture)   Declining (Intel Phase-out)   High
Music Pros   Best for Logic/Core Audio   Best for existing HDX rigs   Best for VEP/Cubase/Heavy VSTs
If you are heavily invested in PCIe-based hardware, your current focus should be on Thunderbolt 5 compatibility and ensuring your hardware manufacturers provide drivers that support the latest Apple Silicon "Super Cores."
7
The discontinuation of the Mac Pro on March 26, 2026, officially ends Apple’s 20-year era of modular desktop workstations. This shift signals a fundamental change in how Apple views high-performance computing, prioritizing integrated efficiency over traditional internal expandability. 9to5Mac

The Shift to "Integrated" Power
The primary reason for this move is the success of Apple Silicon. The unified memory architecture used in chips like the M2 Ultra and M4 Max provides massive performance gains but requires RAM and GPU components to be integrated directly onto the chip.

Redundant Chassis: The 2023 Mac Pro’s large tower design became mostly "empty space" because users could no longer upgrade RAM or swap out GPUs.
The Mac Studio Factor: The Mac Studio proved that Apple could deliver the same workstation-level power in a fraction of the size and at a lower cost.

What This Means for Professionals
For the vast majority of creators, this is a win for efficiency, but it does leave a small gap in the market:
Loss of PCIe Slots: Niche users who relied on internal PCIe lanes for high-end networking or specialized audio/video cards must now look toward external Thunderbolt enclosures.
The New Performance Ceiling: The Mac Studio is now the flagship pro desktop. Apple is expected to launch an M5 Ultra version at WWDC 2026, which will likely be the most powerful Mac ever made.
Scaling via Software: With the introduction of macOS Tahoe 26.2, Apple enabled RDMA over Thunderbolt 5, allowing users to scale performance by connecting multiple Macs together—effectively replacing internal expansion with high-speed external clustering.

The End of "Made in USA"
The Mac Pro was notably the only Apple device assembled in the United States (Texas). Its discontinuation likely marks the end of this domestic manufacturing chapter, as production for other models like the Mac mini is planned for different global facilities.

Overall, Apple is betting that modern professional workflows value performance-per-watt and compact reliability over the bulky, customizable towers of the past.

Are you considering a Mac Studio to replace a tower setup, or are you looking for external expansion solutions?
8
it can be really hard to find someone to repair stuff like this if u dont live near  like new york or chicago or london england or capital cities - even in Toronto its hard to find people that are able to properly repair such things .. steve's music store shut down recently too . people need to support their music -related businesses or they stop being able to survive
9
samplers - 1980s / Re: Roland S-10 (1986) sampling keyboard
« Last post by smoot smooth.as.silk on April 11, 2026, 08:07:17 AM »
Good stuff.
My S-10 Just broke down :( Turned it on after not using it for a while, everything looked normal ... noticed some high frequency buzzing sound ... then I pushed some button ... and all lights went out. Turned it on and of ... dead. If anyone has any idea what the problem might be ... please let me know. I'm wondering if it could be some capacitor dying of old age or something.

Check this site,  https://amsynths.co.uk/2019/02/18/roland-s10-sampler-refurb/   Must be the electrolytic capacitors on the power supply.  Tr to replace them. Use a multimeter to find out if the power supply is indeed dead or not.
10
E-mu products | Ensoniq Products | Akai "S" Series | Akai MPCs | Drum Machines | Roland JV Addons | early 90s Synths | late 80s synths | Roland Samplers

release dates listed here: http://www.dtech.lv/techarticles_roland_exp.html
http://www.nathansheldon.com/xp-80/expansion-board-demos.html
http://cms.rolandus.com/assets/media/pdf/Selecting_Ints_and_SR-JV80s.pdf
more demos: http://www.nathansheldon.com/xp-80/expansion-board-demos.html

House http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-19.htm (2001)

World Collection Latin http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-18.htm

Country Collection http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-17.htm

Orchestral II http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-16.htm

Special FX http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-15.htm

World Collection Asia http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-14.htm

Vocal http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-13.htm

HipHop http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-12.htm doc 1998
1997
Techno http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-11.htm

Bass & Drums http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-10.htm

Session http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-09.htm doc 1996

60s & 70s http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-08.htm doc 1995

Super Soundset http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-07.htm doc 1995

Dance http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-06.htm doc 1995

World http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-05.htm doc 1994

Vintage Synth http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-04.htm doc 1993

Piano http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-03.htm doc 1992

Orchestral http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-02.htm doc 1992

Pop http://www.synthmania.com/sr-jv80-01.htm doc 1992


If you have the original ROMS  you can use Virtual JV: free Roland JV-880 emulation. Al those cards at your hands  ;D

https://github.com/giulioz/jv880_juce   Its a true emulation of the ROMs  ;)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10